G. R. No. 227911 - Supreme Court E-Library The present case stemmed from seven disciplinary actions filed on September 28, 2007 by UP before the SDT against Ante and others, namely: Marcelino G Veloso III (Veloso), Keefe Dela Cruz (Dela Cruz), and Armand Lorenze V Sapitan (Sapitan) (Ante, et al)
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Saskatchewan (Attorney General . . . In other words, Review Board proceedings involve no accusation by the state of moral wrongdoing — the first requirement in order for s 7 to mandate proof beyond a reasonable doubt [86] The presumption of innocence under s 7 of the Charter requires Saskatchewan’s proceedings for major disciplinary offences to use a criminal standard of proof
USCA11 Case: 25-14171 Document: 20-2 Date Filed: 01 08 2026 Page: 1 of 32 antially disrupt the work and discipline of the school " 393 U S at 513 Importantly for present purposes, even in the course of ruling in the students' favor, the Court gave schools a measure of leeway to regulate otherwise protected expression on the ground that what it called the "special characteristics" of the school environment justify
PNP MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 2013-020 - Supreme Court E-Library This PNP MC shall cover issues on imposition of discipline, law and order from the first day of police work of every PNP personnel until his her service shall be severed by lawful cause or his her retirement date
G. R. No. 157684 - The Lawphil Project While the investigation of a case may be delegated to and conducted by another body or group of officials, the disciplining authority must nevertheless weigh the evidence gathered and indicate the applicable law
Washington DC | National Law Journal Topic | Law. com Providing news, analysis, and insights on the Washington, D C legal community, including in-depth coverage of SCOTUS, appellate courts, and key regulatory bodies